The King David Show

KDNews


Leave a comment

CONFIRMED: Turkey Running Proxy-Invasion of Syria


Tony Cartalucci
Infowars.com
July 26, 2012

The Washington Post has just published an article with the very misleading titled, “Turkey a hub for Syria revolution as illegal border crossing points abound,” in which it describes “Salafi Muslims,” who have “come to offer help from the countries of the Persian Gulf region” arming and joining the so-called “Free Syrian Army.” The article also claims “weapons are ferried into Syria, delivered by Turkish military trucks and picked up by fighters on the other side in the dead of night.”

A more apt title would be, “Turkey hosts invading Saudi and Qatari mercenary army.”

This confirms earlier reports featured in the New York Times and the Washington Post, that not only are the Gulf States of Saudi Arabia and Qatar funding and arming militants via Turkey, but that the US is coordinating the logistical aspects of the operation as well.

Likewise, CNN has attempted to spin concessions made by its own Ivan Watson, traveling with sectarian extremists into Syria, where it was admitted:

Meanwhile, residents of the village where the Syrian Falcons were headquartered said there were fighters of several North African nationalities also serving with the brigade’s ranks.
A volunteer Libyan fighter has also told CNN he intends to travel from Turkey to Syria within days to add a “platoon” of Libyan fighters to armed movement.

CNN has now added:

On Wednesday, CNN’s crew met a Libyan fighter who had crossed into Syria from Turkey with four other Libyans. The fighter wore full camouflage and was carrying a Kalashnikov rifle. He said more Libyan fighters were on the way.

The foreign fighters, some of them are clearly drawn because they see this as … a jihad. So this is a magnet for jihadists who see this as a fight for Sunni Muslims.

CNN then attempts to claim the “real” Syrian “revolutionaries” “do not want an Islamist political agenda to be mixed in with their revolution.”


Photo: The face of Libya’s “revolution” was literally Al Qaeda. Abdul Hakim Belhaj, commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) listed by the US State Departmentas a “Foreign Terrorists Organization,” was armed and backed by NATO (including the US) in his efforts to topple the government of Libya. Belhaj more recently pledged (NATO) weapons, cash, and Libyan militants to the “Free Syrian Army.”

….

Unfortunately for CNN, despite its best efforts, it cannot qualify its claim that these foreign fighters are “unwanted,” – for the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) has long since exposed itself as a sectarian extremist front infiltrated with foreign fighters and foreign weapons,stretching back as far as 2007.

Saudis and Qataris Attempt “Arab League-UN” Rescue of Faltering Mercenaries

Perhaps as a sign the Gulf States of Saudi Arabia and Qatar are stretched to the limits of their ability to covertly undermine Syria, they have announced plans to seek “UN General Assembly action” for a “political transition and establishment of a democratic government in Syria.” For the despotic, unelected, grandiose nepotism of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to call for a “democratic government in Syria” is truly a move made as much out of desperation as it is one of farcical hypocrisy.

Image: In “progressive” Saudi Arabia, who is calling for a “democratic transition” in Syria, women are not even allowed to drive, let alone vote for their leaders – who with Qatar, are amongst the few remaining absolute monarchies on Earth.

….

Both Gulf State nations are run by absolute monarchies – some of the only kind still left in the world. In Saudi Arabia, not only are elections out of the question, but women are in fact, prohibited from even driving. How the Saudis themselves are not subject to UN resolutions, open condemnations, sanctions of all kinds, and ultimatums over their own dictatorship is a true indication of the bankrupted, hypocritical, self-serving dysfunction that punctuates a Western corporate-financier dominated “international order.” It is an “international community” that creates the illusion of urgency and injustice when it seeks to expand its interests into one nation, but conveniently ignores real injustice when it jeopardizes their interests elsewhere.


Turkey Supports Subversion of Syria, While Crushing Dissent at Home

Turkey itself has been waging a decades-long bloody campaign against its own armed uprising in predominately Kurdish areas bordering Syria, Iraq, and Iran. In fact, at one point, the US allowed Turkish tanks to cross into American-occupied Iraq to attack villages suspected of harboring armed Kurdish separatists in 2008, mirroring the very tactics Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is now condemning Syria for. The Guardian reported in their 2008 article, “Iraq demands Turkey withdraw from border conflict with Kurds,” that the conflict had been raging since 1984 and had cost the lives of 40,000 people.

Turkey has in recent weeks, violated Iraq’s airspace in order to strafe and bomb Kurdish villages inside Iraqi territory. Iraq has lodged a complaint with the UN Security Council – a complaint likely to go unnoticed.

One can only imagine the “threat” Syria would be portrayed as if it were to likewise strafe and bomb targets beyond its borders in pursuit of now admittedly foreign-armed, foreign fighters invading its country via Turkey. Turkey, a NATO member since 1952, would most likely invoke “Chapter V” of NATO’s treaty, a mutual defense clause that makes an attack on one alliance member an attack on all members – thus opening up the door for more direct foreign military intervention.

Turkey’s ruling government led by PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is in fact undermining its own national security by running errands for NATO versus Syria. By supporting foreign terrorists invading neighboring Syria, it undermines the legitimacy of its own campaign against Kurdish rebels within its borders, not to mention beyond them. Turkey’s current stance vis-a-vis Syria is not shared by all members of Turkey’s government, and at this critical stage, now more than ever they need to make their voices heard both to the Turkish people and to the people of the world.

Carving Out “Safe Havens” for the US State Department’s SNC

The ultimate goal of inundating Syria with foreign fighters and weapons while Saudi Arabia and Qatar farcically call for a “democratic transition” in Syria is to create a “safe haven” from which the US State Department coached and directed “Syrian National Council” (SNC) can rule from – further dividing and undermining the Syrian nation-state.

This geopolitical objective was first summarized in the Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution’s March 2012 Middle East Memo #21 “Assessing Options for Regime Change (.pdf)and recently reiterated almost verbatim by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The US foreign-policy think-tank, Brookings Institution blueprinted designs for regime change in Libya as well as both Syria and Iran. In their report, “Assessing Options for Regime Change” it is specifically stated (emphasis added):

“An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership.This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.” –page 4, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution.


Image: Also out of the Brookings Institution, Middle East Memo #21 “Assessing Options for Regime Change (.pdf),” makes no secret that the humanitarian “responsibility to protect” is but a pretext for long-planned regime change.

….

The Brookings Institution’s “safe havens” and “humanitarian corridors” are meant to be established by NATO-member Turkey, who had been threatening to partially invade Syria in order to accomplish this. And while Turkey claims this is based on “humanitarian concerns,”examining Turkey’s abysmal human rights record in addition to its own ongoing armed campaign against the Kurdish people both within and beyond its borders, it is clear they are simply fulfilling the agenda established by their Western patrons on Wall Street and in the city of London.

There is still extreme danger that with Aleppo still under threat by foreign fighters and the so-called “Free Syrian Army,” NATO is preparing cross-border provocations to justify the “limited military power” Brookings calls for in establishing its prescribed “safe havens.” Fabricated “massacres,” “humanitarian crisis,” and false flag attacks involving chemical weapons are also pretexts the West might use for a limited military incursions into Syria in an attempt to cripple its military and lend its militant proxies a “safe haven” in Syria to rule over.

Tony Cartalucci is the writer and editor at Land Destroyer

Advertisements


Leave a comment

Chicago Alderman Moves to Ban Business for Politically Incorrect View on Gays


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 26, 2012

photoChick-fil-A President Dan Cathy.

In Rahm Emanuel’s Chicago, the Alderman controlling Logan Square wants to block Chick-fil-A from opening a store because its CEO opposes gay marriage.

Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy said last week he believes in the biblical definition of marriage as between a man and a woman.

“I think we’re inviting God’s judgment when we shake our fist at him, you know, [saying], ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.’ And I pray on God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we would have the audacity to try and redefine what marriage is all about,” Cathy said.

“Same sex marriage, same-sex couples — that’s the civil rights fight of our time. To have those discriminatory policies from the top down is just not something that we’re open to,” said Moreno. “We want responsible businesses.”

In other words, business that does not tote the political agenda of government – and theUnited Nations – will not be allowed to operate. Like the former Soviet Union, Chicago will only permit business (called “enterprises” in the Soviet Union) to exist if it follows the political dictates of government.

If an alderman (essentially a Mafia don) disagrees with the personal opinion espoused by a business owner, he will be run out of town after a self-righteous tongue lashing.

“If he’s in the business of selling chicken in Chicago, he should be in the business of having equal rights for everyone. Period,” Moreno told the Sun-Times. “If it looks like a chicken, talks like a chicken, walks like a chicken, it’s a chicken. If you’re saying you don’t respect the values and rights of same-sex couples, that trickles down through the organization. … That’s paramount to the way the company behaves.”

Chick-fil-A had received zoning approval for the restaurant in the 2500 block of North Elston on Chicago’s westside. The company still needs City Council approval. This may not be forthcoming thanks to Moreno and Chicago mayor Emanuel.

Chicago’s godfather agrees with the alderman. “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors and our family members. And if you’re gonna be part of the Chicago community, you should reflect Chicago values,” Emanuel said Wednesday.

“What the CEO has said as it relates to gay marriage and gay couples is not what I believe, but more importantly, it’s not what the people of Chicago believe. We just passed legislation as it relates to civil union and my goal and my hope … is that we now move on recognizing gay marriage. I do not believe that the CEO’s comments … reflects who we are as a city.”

Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian of Young Turks say Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy “hates” gays:


Leave a comment

Foreign Lawmakers Slam “Assassin” Obama Over Drone Strikes


President “Violating the principles of the Western world”

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
July 26, 2012

British and Danish politicians have spoken out in disgust at the US policy of drone strikes in Somalia, Pakistan and Yemen, calling it targeted assassination.

“It’s terrible,” said Rasmus Helveg Petersen, the foreign policy spokesperson for Radikale, the Danish Social Liberal Party.

“The United States has no right to carry out these types of executions of suspected political adversaries. It contravenes international law.” Petersen said in an interview with the Politiken newspaper.

Peterson added that Obama was mirroring terrorist activity by adhering to the policy. ”It is tantamount to terrorism where you also kill people for political motives in someone else’s territory.” Peterson said.

Another Danish lawmaker, Soren Pind, of the Venstre party, Denmark’s opposition party, also blasted Obama. In an interview with Ræson magazine, Pind said “I criticised George Bush for combining the presidency with something we could view as torture. But what Obama is doing is combining the presidency with assassination. In reality it is much worse. Obama is completely ignoring the western world’s principles, and in the long run it will be detrimental,”

Officials from another far left party in Denmark, Enhedslisten, also weighed in, saying they would push the issue in the Danish parliament’s foreign policy committee.

  • A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Denmark’s foreign minister, Villy Sovndal was less critical but still intimated that the government was displeased with the US policy of drone strikes.“I am not prepared to comment further than saying that we do not use drones ourselves and that international rules must be adhered to,” said Sovndal.

Denmark has traditionally been a strong ally to the US. However, Ole Wæver, political scientist at the University of Copenhagen notes “Obama has used up his goodwill account…There has been until now broad political agreement that we stood shoulder to shoulder with the US, but people are slowly realising that the world order is changing.”

Neither the US government, nor the US Embassy in Denmark has responded to the criticism.

Meanwhile, in Britain, a group of twelve parliamentarians are reported to have penned a letter to Obama demanding that drone strikes in Pakistan are halted.

The International Herald Tribune reports that the officials contend that the strikes are only serving to fuel hatred of the US and provide justification for future terrorist activities and that too many innocent people are being killed as a result of the attacks. The letter also notes that the strikes are a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

Earlier this week, it was reported that the incoming head of Pakistan’s intelligence network plans to demand that the US halt the drone strikes and let Pakistan deal with weeding out militants.

In related developments, a UN report released this week states that US drone aircraft over Somalia pose a significant danger to air traffic and may also violate an arms embargo against the country.

As we reported Monday, there is a huge growing movement in Pakistan speaking out against US aggression in the country.

One prominent voice is that of Imran Khan, the leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) who recently slammed the US policy of targeting militants in Pakistan and elsewhere with unmanned drone strikes, calling the practice “immoral and insane”.

The Obama administration has been heavily criticized for moving to block the release of information relating to its overseas drone assassination programme, and will not even acknowledge that it exists, despite countless public references to the programme and the proven existence of an official “kill list”.

It is common knowledge that the Obama administration has exponentially increased the use of drone missile attacks in countries such as Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

The president has referred to the programme several times in public, as have officials such as counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan.

Earlier this year, the New York Times ran a major piece on the programme, revealing that the White House has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to provide any evidence or go through any legal process.

Furthermore, the Times revealed that Obama adopted a policy that “in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants.”

The administration merely has to state that the target is a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.

In December of last year, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backingfor state sponsored assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any legal protection against being marked for summary execution.

During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism without trial on a case by case basis.

Perhaps the real reason that the administration wants the details of the programme kept under wraps is that, as reported by Propublica recently, the programme is potentially much bigger in scope than anyone had previously thought.

The administration’s figures do not add up, they are chock full of contradictions and discrepancies, and there can be little doubt that there have been many many more civilian deaths as a result of drone attacks than have been publicly acknowledged.

Experts, including UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Christof Heyns, as well as Pakistan’s UN ambassador in Geneva, Zamir Akram, have described the drone assassination programme as a violation of the international legal system, saying that some attacks may constitute war crimes.

Akram, who noted that US drone strikes had killed more than 1,000 civilians in Pakistan, also said “We find the use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the ‘war against terror’. It leads to greater levels of terror rather than reducing them.

Many also contend that the attacks infringe the national sovereignty of Pakistan and constitute an act of war.

In 2010, a report by Washington think tank The New America Foundation found that 32% of the more than 1,200 people killed since 2004 in Pakistan, or around 1 in 3, were innocent bystanders rather than dangerous terrorists.

While the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee has stated that the Pakistani government is actively facilitating the attacks by providing bases from which to launch the drones, Pakistani authorities have consistently voiced opposition to cross border missile strikes, which have been ongoing for years, but have accelerated since day one of Obama’s presidency. During Obama’s first year in office, there were 53 reported drone missile attacks; more than were carried out during the entirety of George W. Bush’s two four year terms in office.

Reports from 2009, drawn up by Pakistani authorities, indicated that close to 700 civilians had already perished, with just 14 wanted Al Qaeda leaders killed in the attacks.

The ACLU estimates that US drone strikes have killed as many as 4,000 people in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia since 2002. Of those, a significant proportion were civilians.

Last week it was revealed that the families of three US citizens killed in drone strikes in Yemen last year – including al-Qaeda preacher Anwar al-Awlaqi – have filed a civil lawsuit against top US officials.

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, andPrisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.


Leave a comment

Lew Rockwell: Ron Paul will NOT Endorse Mitt Romney


Infowars.com
June 15, 2012

Lew Rockwell is an anarcho-capitalist, the president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, the editor of LewRockwell.com, and former Ron Paul congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982. He is the author of numerous books, including Speaking of Liberty and The Left, The Right and The State.


1 Comment

Egypt’s Dog and Pony Revolution


Egyptians get a hard lesson in western-style ‘democracy’

Patrick Henningsen
Infowars.com
June 5, 2012

Last year, Egypt’s collective hopes were high as the Arab Spring was threatening to spread democracy and freedom through the Middle East and North Africa. In reality, the movement has sadly fallen well short of its lofty promises and hopes, bringing instead a re-consolidation of corruption and dictatory rule in Egypt.

A few days ago, Egypt’s ousted leader Hosni Mubarak was sentenced to life by the high court, having been found guilty of ordering the murder of hundreds of protesters in Tahir Square last year, in a judgement that was clearly designed by Egypt’s ruling military dictator class as a pressure-release valve aimed at a a public still fuming at the wanton police state violence which has already claimed hundreds of lives and caused thousands of serious physical injuries.

None of the military command were found guilty during the recent show trial in Egypt. In addition, many more Egyptians were killed and seriously beaten after Mubarak left power, and not a word by the courts as to who will be held accountable for these casualties. After they had swept into power during the Mubarak’s void, it should be easy to deduce that it’s the military class- and not the Mubarak-like puppets in Egypt, who hold the levers of political, financial and social control in Egypt.

Looking beyond the media curtain, one can see that both the trail of Mubarak and the so-called democratic elections we are now seeing are nothing more than another cynical dog and pony show, carefully stage-managed from Washington and Obama adviser Samantha Powers and her Office of Multilateral Affairs, with Hillary Clinton providing the required media soundbites.

Egyptian Military Command SCAF and its key leader, General Mohamed Hussein Tantawi were briefed and directed by Powers and  Michael McFaul from the early days of the Arab Spring and played a pivotal role in allowing NATO-sanctioned arms to flow freely over Egypt’s western border with Libya during the west’s destruction of the Libyan infrastructure and regime change operation in 2011. In order for NATO-backed al-Qaida rebel forces in Libya to win, the Egyptian military junta had to smuggle arms into eastern Libya to help overthrow the regime of the late Col. The Wall Street Journal report confirmed this on March 17, 2011:

  • A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“Egypt’s military has begun shipping arms over the border to Libyan rebels with Washington’s knowledge, U.S. and Libyan rebel officials said…”

SCAF leader Tanwai would also have been instructed where, when and how Egyptian elections were to take place, not least because of Washington’s annual gift of over $2 billion in military aid, a gift they receive under the condition of loyalty to US policy objective in the region.

Washington’s desire for countries like Egypt, is to export the most corrupt and ineffectual democracy on the planet – American Democracy, a complete banker and military industry-controlled system, with a total and adolescent-like media focus on ‘the party leader’, or President, while genuine movements are constantly marginalized.

Like in the US, Saul Alinsky methods are put into action in order to divide society into subdivisions, in a divide and rule system where injustice is used as an instrument of control. The recent Mubarak verdict was a perfect example of a Alinsky-manipulated event, where the real military and security service criminals were intentionally acquitted, and the puppet was hung high – a result which will leave a bad taste in their mouths for years to come. Meanwhile, opposing political sides will promise to restore the scales of justice with a proper verdict.

The illusion of “free and fair elections” in Egypt have been touted by the western corporate media, but the media – and Washington, fail to mention that these so-called free elections have been done under Military Rule in Egypt. In the wake of Mubarak’s demise, the Egyptian military establishment has sought-  from day one, to control the electoral process and has brokered the two remaining media front-runners for leadership, Ahmed Shafiq andMohammed Morsi.

Former Mubarak associate Shafiq represents the secularist old guard, while Morsi represents the Islamist movement, running under the umbrella of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The harshest lesson which Egyptians will learn through their so-called Arab Spring is that their political system will arrive at the very same cycle of privilege which governs both North America and Europe, a system whereby the connected ruling elite and other political leaders who have been embedded in leadership by the military and security services will be the ones in positions of power and influence, making much needed progress in society all but unattainable by western democratic means. Egyptian leaders will  once again preside over one of the largest gaps in wealth and opportunity on the planet and one of the most corrupt political systems in that hemisphere.

Even the Muslim Bortherhood Party and its candidate Dr Morsi are gradually moving into the globalist fold, having all but agreed – in advance of the electoral outcome, the IMF’s debt schedule for Egypt in 2012 and beyond. This is further proof that prospective leaders in Egypt, no matter who it is, are so desperate for a seat at the table that they will willingly sell their country’s economic prosperity down the Nile in return for political power.

Rather than deploying the old Ajax method of over-throwing foreign governments and parachuting-in its puppets, Washington has come to rely on a much more complex array of ‘human rights’ and  ‘pro-democracy’ foundation-funded and US State Department-funded organizations around the globe like the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, National Endowment for Democracy, and most notably in Tunisia and Egypt – CANVAS and its Soros sponsors the Open Society Institute and Freedom House. But keeping its influence peddling and regime change activities hidden from the public view has become increasingly difficult in the age of digital awareness.

Hoping to gain an upper hand in negotiations, the Egyptian military establishment itself made a mid-board move in its chess match against Washington DC and Langley – expelling, arresting and detaining hundreds of US-linked NGO and foundation workers in Egypt. Obama’s response to the Egypt NGO incident sent a clear message: provided American operatives overseas are not harmed, Washington cares little at all about human rights – and even less about its Arab NGO operatives – all of whom were hung out to dry in Cairo. 

It appears now, that working for US-funded ‘democracy and human rights’ programs in places like Egypt will not guarantee you any protection – should your organization come under fire for US-sponsored spying activities.

The Obama administration quickly reconsidered its previously stern position with Egypt over the NGO raids, going ahead with full military aid to Egypt.

In other words, business as usual in the Middle East, and in Washington DC.

Another ‘Dog and Pony’ democracy in Egypt, just like ours in Washington.

….


Leave a comment

“Anti-Democratic” World Government Advocate Attends Bilderberg


FT writer Rachman outlined plan for global UN dictatorship

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, June 4, 2012

Financial Times writer Gideon Rachman was in attendance at this year’s 2012 Bilderberg Group conference, no doubt to further the agenda he advanced in a December 2008 FT article in which he argued that “everything is in place” for a dictatorial world government to be imposed by a technocratic elite.

Rachman was spotted entering the conference in Chantilly Virginia by London Guardian journalist Charlie Skelton.

In his 2008 article And now for a world government, Rachman admitted that the elite’s plan for a global government was inherently undemocratic in nature.

“International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,” he wrote, citing the continual rejection of EU expansion when the question is put to a vote. “In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” added Rachman.

Rachman’s world government would function like the European Union. “It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force,” he wrote.

In addition, the authoritarian global government would impose “A legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force,” according to Rachman.

Rachman also notes that such an agenda would have to be established through euphemistic language to avoid “people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland”.

The FT writer explained how the imposition of world government was now “plausible” because it could be more easily justified by the financial crisis, “global warming” and the “global war on terror.”

  • A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Rachman’s 2008 call for authoritarian technocrats to be put in charge of the global economy in preparation for the official birth of global government is now well on its way to completion, with the economies of France, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Greece, along with the IMF and the European Central Bank, all under Goldman Sachs banker occupation.

I have challenged Rachman to a debate on his view that “everything is in place” for an authoritarian world government to be imposed by his Bilderberg chums. Read the email below.

Gideon,

I’m guessing your war criminal friend Henry Kissinger was receptive to the ideas outlined in your “and now for a world government” piece?

Oh I’m sorry, I forgot that over 100 of the world’s power brokers jet half way across the world for three days just for a nice dinner and a game of golf.

So when’s your report on Bilderberg 2012 going to appear in the FT?

I know I know, Wolfie (Martin Wolf – FT editor and Bilderberg member) would never allow such heresy.

Were you one of the snobs labeling us all cockroaches?

Come on, Gideon, there’s still time for you to turn away from the dark side.

I challenge you to a debate on the Alex Jones Show – do you have the balls?

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

 

Tags: 

Share this article:

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • digg
  • reddit
  • email

 

Sponsored Link: How much do you REALLY need to retire? A former eye surgeon says you can actually retire on just $10,000. See his radical plan in full detail, here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Leave a comment

NC Sen. Phil Berger & Rep. Bert Jones still haven’t responded to Nullify-NDAA Petition


Brian D. Hill
uswgo.com
June 5, 2012

Update: Phone numbers and contact info of Sen. Phil Berger and Rep. Bert Jones are added below this article so you can contact them and urge them to take action.

North Carolina state Senator Phil Berger and Representative Bert Jones have still kept quiet on a response to the Nullify-NDAA Petition with over 215 confirmed Constituents signatures, 221 signatures in total collected in Rockingham County. A paper petition is suppose to carry more weight then a Internet petition because paper petitions have to manually be signed with real signatures and usually a address, town/city, and/or phone number is added to confirm that those that signed were Constituents and to be kept on permanent government record. Those that have signed it are apart of North Carolina political civil rights history.

Last weekend the Patriot Coalition has also gone to the NC General Assembly to bring out the facts on why the state of North Carolina should end it’s relationship with ICLEI and the UN’s Agenda 21 Environmental Hoax, and the NDAA 2012 and 2013.

USWGO plans tomorrow to again call Sara Riggins the Constituent Liason of Sen. Berger’s office and the staff at Rep. Jones office to ask them to respond to the Constituents in Rockingham County that signed the Nullify-NDAA Petition. USWGO will also contact the RockinghamUpdate to let them know the result.

Representative Bryan R. Holloway has taken a step towards fighting the NDAA due to the effects of the petition by constituents, and the email which brings out this fact has beenpublicly released by USWGO.

If the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2012 and 2013 is not stopped, Americans will start being bombarded by even more Nazi-style propaganda similar to Anti-Jew propaganda by Hitler’s Nazi team within months, and Americans can be disappeared and secretly raped, tortured, and even killed forever because of their political preferences similar to Nazi Concentration camps killing political dissidents.

That is all USWGO has to report on this matter until more information heads our way.

You can contact our reps and senator below to get them to follow the Constitution and take action according to the Nullify-NDAA Petiton Constituents wishes.

Senator Phil Berger (Rep)
President Pro Tempore
2011-2012 Session

Office: 2008 Legislative Building
Phone: (919) 733-5708
Email: Phil.Berger@ncleg.net
Legislative Mailing Address: NC Senate
16 W. Jones Street, Room 2008
Raleigh, NC 27601-2808
Terms in Senate: 6     (0 in House)
District: 26
Counties Represented: GuilfordRockingham
Occupation: Attorney
Address: P.O. Box 1309, Eden, NC 27289-1309
Phone: (336) 623-5210
Representative Bert Jones (Rep)
2011-2012 Session
Office: 306A1 Legislative Office Building
Phone: 919-733-5779
Email: Bert.Jones@ncleg.net
Legislative Mailing Address: NC House of Representatives
300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 306A1
Raleigh, NC 27603-5925
Terms in House: 1     (0 in Senate)
District: 65
Counties Represented: Rockingham
Occupation: Dentistry
Address: 299 Fairfield Rd., Reidsville, NC 27320
Phone: 336-342-6171